County Leader Says U.S. Constitution is Under Attack
County Commissioner Jack Mariano says it’s time for Pasco to take a stand in support of the United States Constitution.
Pasco County Commissioner Jack Mariano wants to make one thing clear: He supports the United States Constitution and its Bill of Rights as written.
And, he wants his fellow commissioners to make the same pledge.
That’s why Mariano intends to ask the entire Pasco County Commission to approve a resolution in support of the Constitution during the board’s Tuesday, March 19, meeting.
Mariano said the idea for the resolution evolved over the course of the board’s past few meetings as discussion about closing the gun show loophole was addressed. While the county has since put on hold a formal discussion about making it illegal for gun show attendees to purchase weapons without a background check, concern about the “chipping away” of the 2nd Amendment weighed on Mariano’s mind, he said.
Recently, Mariano suggested the board declare its support for the amendment that gives Americans the right to bear arms. Other commissioners, he said, suggested a declaration in support of the entire Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Mariano agreed.
“We support the Constitution as written,” he said.
When asked if he felt the Constitution is under attack, he responded: “Absolutely, I do.”
Among other things, “the 2nd Amendment has been chipped away,” he said.
The Commission meets March 19 at 10 a.m. at the West Pasco Government Center, 8731 Citizens Drive, in New Port Richey. Other items on the agenda include potential new staff members for Animal Services and proposed renovations at the county’s Emergency Operations Center.
What do you think, New Port Richey? Do you support the U.S. Constitution as written or is it time to reconsider the document? Share your thoughts in the comments section.
See Also:
Rob Marlowe
7:11 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Grandstanding a bit, so it seems. The Second Amendment has always had some restrictions, eg. I've got no right to own and use a suitcase nuke. Where you draw the line between the bolt action .22 target rifle I used while on the college rifle team and the proverbial suitcase nuke is open to debate. That debate is healthy and the right of citizens to address their representatives on hot topics of the day such as this is also protected by our Constitution.
That being said, the Constitution IS under attack from both extremes of the political spectrum. We are far more of a police state than we were when I was growing up. The TSA is exhibit A.
Rick Schell
2:12 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Rob, sorry, but I always hate when people go to the "Nuke" example. The second amendment was based on what a foot soldier would own and carry. It was the most current weapons available to them so that they would have the ability to form a militia. Just for the record, the militia is NOT the organized military. Sure technology has brought much more advanced weaponry than in the days of the revolution, but back in the 1700s and even into the 1800s most cannons and artillery was privately owned. There are already restrictions on fully automatic weapons so no, you can't just go buy them online or go down to the local gun show and buy them like I have read on other sites. There are actually thousands of laws all ready on the books pertaining to guns, but those laws are not being enforced the way they should. We don't need more gun laws, we just need law enforcement to enforce the ones we already have. Liberals need to stop attacking the average law abiding citizen. The second amendment was not meant to give us the right to own a hunting rifle or shotgun, it was to allow us to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government, both foreign and domestic. No one would argue that anyone needs a nuke. That is not even a debate.
Mark
7:15 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Some people take a little more time to realize that we have a huge problem...even in the 1800s we had gun bands in some city's across America!
Rick Schell
2:15 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
You will find that a great majority of those cities were run by corrupt politicians
Mary Ann Hoogeveen
8:31 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Mariano must be looking to run for a higher office,he's not suited to run for dog catcher.
Peter J. Lee
8:45 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
He's a slippery one! I'd much rather he look after the things he was elected to look after than position himself for other office. I am a firearms instructor, and even I am not dumb enough to try and block universal background checks.....
guillermo
9:20 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
The american people should realize that we are living in a 21 first century era.
Our Constitution dates centuries ago.
Are we high jacked by old concepts written then? or are we defending fiercely a national religious tradition, like judaism
Just asking.
Rick Schell
2:21 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Just because something is old does NOT mean it is not still relevant. You mentioned the Bible, it is still both relevant and viable today. The Constitution is the same.
Rev Michael Carbone
10:42 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
I thought our commissioners already took an oath to uphold the constitution - was their oath suppose to include "as it is written" - there are other more important issues that need to be addressed like the huge feril cat problem this county has - rural sheriff and fire department coverage - those are a lot more important than bringing up during a PUBLIC meeting for the other commissioners to "TAKE A PLEDGE" to support what their OATH already says that they support
TBL35
11:27 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
So glad to see so many who see this as the simple-minded pandering that it is. Surely the county has more pressing business than this conspiracy nonsense.
Robert Faughnan
12:53 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
While this may be grandstanding I see no issue with local officials showing support for the Constitution. There may be pressing issues that need attention but affirming support for the principals this country was founded on should be high on that list.
Important as local cat issues and avoiding a slippery slope are I think the commissioners can show this support and get the rest of the day job they have done.
TBL35
9:20 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
They show that by doing their job & dealing with local issues, not by silly pandering & flag waving.
Rick Schell
1:49 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
What I say is BRAVO!! I'm so tired of all of these politicians that are just caving to the liberals who want to erode our rights away and turn us into a socialist country. I don't care if he is the Mayor, the City commissioner, the dog catcher or the toilet bowl cleaner. Take a stand. The constitution is not something that becomes old and outdated, it is the standard by which our country lives by. It is that line in the sand that allows us to keep balance with our God given freedom. If you keep moving the line, we will Lose Our Freedom eventually. People are so stupid they think it can't happen to us. Well, I'm here to tell you that it can and it is happening. The question is, what are we going to do about it? At least Jack Mariano is trying to take a stand!
Rick Schell
1:52 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Reverend, a .22 will take care of your feral cat problem.
Jimmy James
1:56 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
The U.S. Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. That's why they're hired...If we want to change it, we can always go through the amendment process. Presently we can use the amendment process to change the amendment process. Simple, but as laid out takes two-thirds of a states legislature in two-thirds of the 50 states plus two-thirds of The U.S. House and Senate, and is subject to presidential veto.
Greg Smithwick
3:04 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
The Constitution "As Written" had no position on slavery. Wonder if Mariano has a position on slavery?
Rick Schell
3:24 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
That is just a stupid statement. Slavery is not an issue today. Besides, slavery was an accepted practice when the Constitution was written, the founding father's didn't protect slavery, in fact their plan was to abolish it at a later time.
Patricia Houghtalen
3:33 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
I was at the meeting to hear first hand the absolutely ridiculous call from Mariano for reconfirming that all Commissioners support the Constitution of The U.S.. Mr. Mariano put words wrapped around amendments to make them sound as thought they were written to just enforce what the Republican Party is trying to do to beat down a President they could not beat with an election and with the support of the people. If you were there to hear his twisted and deformed wording to try to block any discussions from the public on issues that he could claim might somehow cause any question on infringement to the bill of Mariano Rights you would see that it was and is just a ploy to
deny your right to have a hearing. We keep hearing the Republican Party trying to compare President Obama to Hitler but the last time I remember reading of this type of arbitrary silencing of public input was when Hitler took over the German Government and stifled any objects to his beliefs. Both in Washington and now here in little old New Port Richy we have this bully boy style of Government and it is called the GOP. No wonder your Party has begun to become unraveled in America. We see and object and reject this style of obstructive and destructive Government both local and national. Mariano you are insulting and insufferable to suggest that anybody has to take allegiance to your reinterpretation of the Constitution to be considered a supporter of our Government. You do not belong in office.
James S
4:02 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
If we REALLY followed the 2nd amendment, nobody would have the right to bear arms! Can't anybody read the part that says ...."in the absence of a standing militia"...?
Well, we now have the sheriff, the police, the national guard. They are all standing militias! I never realized Mariano was a right wing gun nut. Now that I know, I certainly won't be supporting his positions any longer.
michael mirra
7:56 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
It also says a well regulated malitia. Selling guns to anybody with the $ without checking them out isn't supporting a well regulated malitia. These gun nuts conveniently blow right past the well regulated part.
michael mirra
7:54 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Anyone that wants to make it harder to do background checks at gun shows is in need of a straight jacket. No wonder these people are reviled & considered crazy. Checking out someone's background before they buy the kind of weapons sold at gun shows is not chipping away at constitutional rights. Sane people should make note of who votes with this guy & make sure they remember to vote to throw Him & them out when votes are cast.
James S
4:22 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Along with all others who are fighting gun control which now includes Dem Senate leader Reid!
IF they are the side of the NRA, vote 'em out regardless of party. SANITY must return to this country!
REDMAN
1:24 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
THE IMPORTANT THING IS THAT JACK'S THINKING DID NOT FLY TODAY. THANKS TO CONCERNED CITIZENS SHOWING UP TODAY.
Tommy Frain
1:31 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
The constitution was written to span all times. The constitution was also written to restrict the government, not restrict the people. I point you to the 9th amendment:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
It is basically referring to all natural rights we inherit from our creator, just because they are not in these amendments, we retain. We must remember why the bill of rights was written, it was written because the people feared if certain rights were not explicitly stated, a tyrannical government like the one they just broke free from would take over.
Specifically, there is general consensus that the 2nd amendment referred to the rights of the people to own weapons equal to the government soldiers normal weaponry. The 2nd amendment is not there for hunting or even self defense from a robber, but to establish the right of the people to, if need be, defend themselves from their own government force or a foreign force on their soil. What Mr. Mariano and the 10th amendment center are pushing for is state and local autonomy when dealing with regulations. The Federal Government's role is to provide for national defense and regulate interstate commerce. The general welfare clause has been so blown open that even Alexander Hamilton would be rolling over. It is not about no regulation or no laws, it is about local governments right to make the rules, not be forced by the Federal Gov.
REDMAN
9:19 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
SIR, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR THE PURPOSE OF BUYING A FIREARM. SURELY YOU WOULD AGREE THAT FELONS SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO DO THAT. I LIKE SHOOTING MY GUNS, NOBODY LIKES TO BE TOLD...WHAT TO DO. IT WOULD BE NICE OF EVERYONE BEHAVED IN A WAY THAT NO LAWS WERE NEEDED. WE KNOW THAT ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN. LEAN FORWARD, I HAVE ON THIS ISSUE.
Diane Carlstrom
2:47 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
I am wondering why anyone would be against background checks for buying a weapon? Does this mean they support someone with a violent criminal background or a dangerous psychiatric diagnosis having a weapon in their control? Maybe we should talk about doing away with the tests and licensing that go with driving a car?
TBL35
9:23 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
It's because they're being told by folks even more paranoid than themselves that background checks will get them on a "list" so that their guns can be rounded up when the big bad gub'mint sends in the black helicopters to bring them to the concentration camp.
I'm only being a little bit facetious here.
Tommy Frain
11:46 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Its not about the background checks. It is about who makes the laws governing communities, local authorities or the Feds. I am against the fed coming here and telling me what regulations we need to institute.